Charles Craig Clements v. R. Madden et al., No. 8:2014cv02002 - Document 174 (C.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUIRING ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED PETITION 172 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) Petitioner's motion to amend his motion for leave to amen d the FAP is granted; (2) Petitioner's amended motion to amend the FAP is granted; (3) the Clerk file the amended proposed SAP lodged on December 23, 2019. Respondent must file and serve an answer to the SAP within 45 days of the date of this Order. (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Charles Craig Clements v. R. Madden et al. Doc. 174 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES CRAIG CLEMENTS, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 RAYTHEL FISHER, Warden, Respondent. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 14-2002-DDP (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND REQUIRING ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED PETITION 16 The Court has reviewed Petitioner’s motion to amend his 17 18 motion for leave to amend the First Amended Petition, proposed 19 amended motion for leave to amend, proposed Second Amended 20 Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. 21 Magistrate Judge. 22 the R. & R. have been filed. 23 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections to The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the 24 Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) Petitioner’s 25 motion to amend his motion for leave to amend the FAP is granted; 26 (2) Petitioner’s amended motion to amend the FAP is granted; (3) 27 the Clerk file the amended proposed SAP lodged on December 23, 28 2019. Respondent must file and serve an answer to the SAP within Dockets.Justia.com 1 45 days of the date of this Order. 2 3 4 5 DATED: 9/45/4242 DEAN D. PREGERSON U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
