Medtronic Corevalve LLC et al v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation et al, No. 8:2011cv00961 - Document 163 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. The Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc., and against Plaintiffs and C ounterclaim-Defendants Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Medtronic Luxembourg S.A.R.L., and Medtronic Vascular Galway Ltd. and ORDERS, ADJUDGES and DECREES as follows: 1. All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,892,281 (Claim Nos. 3, 4, 7, 12, 14 and 15) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. 2. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by their First Supplemental Complaint [D.I. 85]. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (db)

Download PDF
Medtronic Corevalve LLC et al v. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation et al Doc. 163 1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA ANA 10 12 MEDTRONIC COREVALVE LLC, MEDTRONIC CV LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L., AND MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY LTD., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, AND EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES (U.S.) INC., 11 15 16 17 20 21 FINAL JUDGMENT COMPLAINT FILED: June 27, 2011 Defendants. 18 19 CASE NO. SACV11-00961 JVS (MLGx) Hon. James V. Selna Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES (U.S.) INC., AND EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES PVT, INC., 22 Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 26 vs. MEDTRONIC COREVALVE LLC, MEDTRONIC CV LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR GALWAY LTD., MEDTRONIC, INC., AND MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC. 27 Counterclaim-Defendants. 23 24 25 28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. SACV11-00961 16156136.1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Having granted Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial 2 Summary Judgment of Priority and Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the ’281 3 Patent in a November 13, 2012 Order [D.I. 158], which is incorporated herein, the 4 Court hereby enters judgment in favor of Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs 5 Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards 6 Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc., and against Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants 7 Medtronic CoreValve LLC, Medtronic Luxembourg S.A.R.L., and Medtronic 8 Vascular Galway Ltd. and ORDERS, ADJUDGES and DECREES as follows: 9 10 1. 12, 14 and 15) are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102. 11 12 2. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 16 Plaintiffs shall take nothing by their First Supplemental Complaint [D.I. 85]. 13 15 All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,892,281 (Claim Nos. 3, 4, 7, Dated: November 26, 2012 The Honorable James V. Selna United States District Judge 17 18 19 Submitted by: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SNELL & WILMER L.L.P William S. O’Hare Deborah S. Mallgrave PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON & GARRISON L.L.P. John E. Nathan (pro hac vice) Catherine Nyarady (pro hac vice) Brian P. Egan (pro hac vice) Jenny C. Wu (pro hac vice) Christopher Terranova (pro hac vice) Attorneys for Defendants and CounterclaimPlaintiffs Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) Inc. 27 28 -216156136.1 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Case No. SACV11-00961

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.