-MLG Wecosign Inc v. IFG Holdings Inc et al, No. 8:2010cv01200 - Document 84 (C.D. Cal. 2011)

Court Description: CONSENT JUDGMENT with respect to Plaintiff Wecosign, Inc and Defendant Tara Walker by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. It is ordered that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against WALKER on each of the seven (7) claims for relief tha t Plaintiff asserted in its Complaint [Dkt. No. 1]. This is a final judgment. Plaintiff and WALKER each waive their respective rights to appeal this final judgment. Each party shall bear its or her own costs and attorneys fees. See order for more information. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 82 . (twdb)

Download PDF
NO JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNA 10 SOUTHERN DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WECOSIGN, INC., a California corporation, ) Case No. 8:10-CV-1200 JST (MLGx) ) ) Plaintiff, ) CONSENT JUDGMENT WITH ) RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF v. ) WECOSIGN, INC. AND ) DEFENDANT TARA WALKER IFG HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada ) corporation d/b/a IFG DIRECT, ) LLC; INSCORE FUNDING ) Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker GROUP; and WE COSIGN USA; ) ASSOCIATED CONCENTS GROUP ) LLC, an entity of unknown form ) and organization; ) MICHAEL ADAMS, an individual ) a/k/a M. MICHAEL ADAMS; ) MARVIN MICHAEL ADAMS; M. ) MICHAEL ADAMS, SR.; and ) MARVIN ADAMS; ) TED WILLIAMS, an individual a/k/a ) TERRY WHITE and TONY ) WILLIAMS; ) MARK AVILA, an individual; ) STAN JONES an individual a/k/a ) SAM JONES; ) ROBERT MILLER an individual; and ) TARA WALKER, an individual; ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1 The above-captioned action having come before this Court upon the 2 pleadings, and it being represented to the Court that Plaintiff WECOSIGN, INC. 3 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant TARA WALKER, an individual, (“WALKER”) 4 have compromised and have agreed upon a basis for settling this action, 5 including the entry of this Consent Judgment, it is hereby 6 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 7 1. 8 subject matter. 9 2. Venue is proper in this judicial district. 10 3. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against This Court has jurisdiction over Plaintiff and WALKER and the 11 WALKER on each of the seven (7) claims for relief that Plaintiff asserted in its 12 Complaint [Dkt. No. 1]. 13 4. WALKER has infringed Plaintiff’s rights in the WECOSIGN mark 14 by using the WE COSIGN USA mark and other derivations thereof in 15 connection with the offering for sale, sale, and/or rendering of financial services 16 in commerce, and WALKER has engaged in acts of unfair competition against 17 Plaintiff. 18 5. WALKER, and all those persons in active concert or participation 19 with WALKER, are hereby enjoined and permanently restrained from each of 20 the following activities: 21 a. Using the mark WECOSIGN or any mark similar thereto or 22 likely to cause confusion therewith, in the sale, offering for sale, 23 advertising, promotion, marketing, or rendering of financial services; 24 b. Using in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or 25 device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, 26 false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading 27 representation of fact that is likely to cause confusion, to cause mistake, 28 or to deceive regarding the origin, sponsorship, or approval of -1- 1 WALKER’s services or falsely to imply a connection or affiliation with 2 Plaintiff or Plaintiff’s WECOSIGN services; 3 c. Unfairly competing with Plaintiff; 4 d. Registering any domain name comprising the mark 5 WECOSIGN or any mark similar thereto or likely to cause confusion 6 therewith; 7 e. 8 Making any false statement(s) about Plaintiff or its business practices; 9 f. assisting, aiding, or abetting any other person or entity in 10 engaging in or performing any of the activities described in 11 Paragraphs 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 5(d), or 5(e) above. 12 6. 13 The use enjoined by this permanent injunction shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: 14 a. all packaging, labels, brochures, letterhead, promotional 15 materials, and advertising materials, whether in print, for television or 16 radio broadcast, or on the Internet, or for other distribution; 17 b. all trade shows or other public displays of goods or services; 18 c. all Internet usage, including domain names; and 19 d. any applications to register or registrations with any 20 government agency. 21 7. This is a final judgment. Plaintiff and WALKER each waive their 22 respective rights to appeal this final judgment. Each party shall bear its or her 23 own costs and attorneys’ fees. 24 8. This Court retains jurisdiction over this Consent Judgment for the 25 purpose of ensuring compliance with the terms hereof and of enabling Plaintiff 26 or WALKER or either of them to apply to this Court at any time for further 27 orders. 28 /// -2- 1 9. In any action to enforce the provisions of this Consent Judgment, 2 the prevailing party shall be entitled, in addition to any other relief granted by 3 the Court, to its or her reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: September 22, 2011 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.