GS Holistic, LLC v. Cali Bear Smoke Shop et al, No. 5:2023cv00454 - Document 28 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff on all claims, and the Defendants are liable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $150,872.70 (comprising statutory damages of $150,000.00 and costs of $872.70), for which let execution issue. [See Judgment for further information.] (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GS Holistic, LLC v. Cali Bear Smoke Shop et al Doc. 28 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. 5:23-cv-00454-JGB-SPx Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED SMOKES INC d/b/a CALI BEAR SMOKE SHOP and MAGID ABDELHADI, Defendants, 18 19 The Court has before it the Plaintiff, GS HOLISTIC, LLC’s Motion for Default 20 Judgment against Defendants, UNITED SMOKES INC d/b/a CALI BEAR SMOKE 21 22 SHOP and MAGID ABDELHADI. Having considered the Plaintiff’s Motion and all 23 documents and evidence attached thereto, and the Court being fully advised, and 24 good cause shown: 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Plaintiff on all claims, and the Defendants are liable to the 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Plaintiff in the amount of $150,872.70 (comprising statutory damages of $150,000.00 and costs of $872.70), for which let execution issue. 3 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant, 5 its agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, successor 6 7 companies, related companies, and all persons acting in concern or participation with 8 it are permanently restrained and enjoined from infringing upon the Stündenglass 9 Marks directly or contributorily, in any manner, including but not limited to: 10 11 (a) Import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, use, 12 acquisition, purchase, offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, 13 distribution, storage, shipment, licensing, development, display, delivery, 14 15 marketing advertising or promotion of the counterfeit Stündenglass product 16 identified in the complaint and any other unauthorized Stündenglass product, 17 counterfeit, copy or colorful imitation thereof; 18 19 (b) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or entity in 20 performing any of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs (a) above. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to 22 23 15 U.S.C. §1118, the Defendants, at their cost, deliver to the Plaintiff for destruction 24 all products, accessories, labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, 25 advertisements, and other material in their possession, custody or control bearing any 26 27 of the Stündenglass Marks. 28 2 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this court retains jurisdiction over any matter pertaining to this judgment. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: October 27, 2023 ____________________________ United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
