Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anthony Todd Johnson et al, No. 5:2020cv01493 - Document 49 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS RICHARD PORTILLO, RJ HOLDINGS GROUP,LLC AND CIS MARKETING, LLC ON CONSENT 48 by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: Defendants Richard Portillo and CIS Marketing, LLC, jointly and severally are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly re the Securities Exchange Act (see document for specified section cites therein) and shallpay disgorgement of $269,375.00, representing net profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Compla int, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $20,888, for a total of $290,263.00, which the Court finds is for the benefit of investors. The Court further imposes a civil penalty against Defendant Richard Portillo in the amount of $192,768.00. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS) (lc)

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Anthony Todd Johnson et al Doc. 49 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 ANTHONY TODD JOHNSON (aka TODD JOHNSON), et al., 17 Defendants. Case No. 5:20-cv-01493-MCS(SHKx) [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS RICHARD PORTILLO, RJ HOLDINGS GROUP, LLC AND CIS MARKETING, LLC 18 19 The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and 20 Defendants Richard Portillo, RJ Holdings Group, LLC and CIS Marketing, LLC 21 (collectively, “Defendants”) having entered a general appearance; consented to the 22 Court’s jurisdiction over Defendants and the subject matter of this action; consented 23 to entry of this Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the 24 Complaint (except as to jurisdiction and except as otherwise provided herein in 25 paragraph VII); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right 26 to appeal from this Judgment: 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants 3 are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 4 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 5 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using 6 any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any 7 facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of 8 any security: 9 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 10 (b) to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a 11 material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light 12 of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or 13 (c) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. 14 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 16 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 17 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or 18 otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and 19 (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone 20 described in (a). II. 21 22 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 23 Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of 24 the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] in the offer or 25 sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or 26 communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: 27 (a) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; 28 (b) to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a 2 1 material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to 2 make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which 3 they were made, not misleading; or 4 (c) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 7 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 8 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or 9 otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and 10 (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone 11 described in (a). III. 12 13 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 14 Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 5 of the 15 Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77e] by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any 16 applicable exemption: 17 (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of 18 any means or instruments of transportation or communication in 19 interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use 20 or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; 21 (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or 22 causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any 23 means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose 24 of sale or for delivery after sale; or 25 (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or 26 communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or 27 offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise 28 any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the 3 1 Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the 2 subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of 3 the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under 4 Section 8 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77h]. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 6 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 7 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or 8 otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and 9 (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone 10 described in (a). IV. 11 12 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 13 Defendants Richard Portillo and CIS Marketing, LLC are permanently restrained and 14 enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, 15 15 U.S.C. § 78o(a), which makes it unlawful for any broker or dealer which is either a 16 person other than a natural person or a natural person, to make use of the mails or any 17 means or instrumentality of interstate commerce to effect any transactions in, or to 18 induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of, any security (other than an 19 exempted security or commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, or commercial bills) 20 unless such broker or dealer is registered in accordance with Section 15(b) of the 21 Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78o(b).. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as 23 provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d)(2), the foregoing paragraph also 24 binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or 25 otherwise: (a) Defendants’ officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and 26 (b) other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone 27 described in (a). 28 4 1 V. 2 IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 3 Defendants Richard Portillo and CIS Marketing, LLC, jointly and severally, shall 4 pay disgorgement of $269,375, representing net profits gained as a result of the 5 conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the 6 amount of $20,888, for a total of $290,263, which the Court finds is for the benefit 7 of investors. The Court further imposes a civil penalty against Defendant Richard 8 Portillo in the amount of $192,768 pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act 9 [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)] and Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)]. 10 Defendants Richard Portillo and CIS Marketing, LLC shall satisfy these obligations 11 by paying for aforementioned sums to the Securities and Exchange Commission 12 with 30 days after entry of this Final Judgment. 13 Defendants may transmit payment electronically to the Commission, which 14 will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request. Payment 15 may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov through the SEC 16 website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm. Defendants may also pay by 17 certified check, bank cashier’s check, or United States postal money order payable to 18 the Securities and Exchange Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to 19 Enterprise Services Center 20 Accounts Receivable Branch 21 6500 South MacArthur Boulevard 22 Oklahoma City, OK 73169 23 and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action number, 24 and name of this Court; Richard Portillo and CIS Marketing, LLC as a defendant in 25 this action; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. 26 Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of payment 27 and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in this action. By 28 making this payment, Defendants relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and 5 1 2 interest in such funds and no part of the funds shall be returned to Defendants. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for disgorgement and 3 prejudgment interest by using all collection procedures authorized by law, including, 4 but not limited to, moving for civil contempt at any time after 30 days following entry 5 of this Final Judgment. The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for 6 penalties by the use of all collection procedures authorized by law, including the 7 Federal Debt Collection Procedures Act, 28 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq., and moving for 8 civil contempt for the violation of any Court orders issued in this action. 9 10 11 Defendants shall pay post judgment interest on any amounts due after 30 days of the entry of this Final Judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Commission shall hold the funds (collectively, the “Fund”) until further 12 order of this Court. The SEC may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the 13 Court’s approval, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of 14 any distribution of the Fund. 15 The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the 16 Court’s approval. Such a plan may provide that the Fund shall be distributed 17 pursuant to the Fair Fund provisions of Section 308(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 18 2002. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the administration of any distribution 19 of the Fund and the Fund may only be disbursed pursuant to an Order of the Court. 20 Regardless of whether any such Fair Fund distribution is made, amounts 21 ordered to be paid as civil penalties pursuant to this Judgment shall be treated as 22 penalties paid to the government for all purposes, including all tax purposes. To 23 preserve the deterrent effect of the civil penalty, Defendant Richard Portillo shall not, 24 after offset or reduction of any award of compensatory damages in any Related 25 Investor Action based on Defendant’s payment of disgorgement in this action, argue 26 that he is entitled to, nor shall he further benefit by, offset or reduction of such 27 compensatory damages award by the amount of any part of Defendant’s payment of a 28 civil penalty in this action (“Penalty Offset”). If the court in any Related Investor 6 1 Action grants such a Penalty Offset, Defendant Richard Portillo, within 30 days after 2 entry of a final order granting the Penalty Offset, notify the Commission’s counsel in 3 this action and pay the amount of the Penalty Offset to the United States Treasury or 4 to a Fair Fund, as the Commission directs. Such a payment shall not be deemed an 5 additional civil penalty and shall not be deemed to change the amount of the civil 6 penalty imposed in this Judgment. For purposes of this paragraph, a “Related 7 Investor Action” means a private damages action brought against Defendant Richard 8 Portillo by or on behalf of one or more investors based on substantially the same facts 9 as alleged in the Complaint in this action. 10 VI. 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the 12 Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth 13 herein, and that Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements 14 set forth therein. VII. 15 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for 17 purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 18 11 U.S.C. § 523, the allegations in the complaint are true and admitted by 19 Defendants, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil 20 penalty or other amounts due by Defendants under this Judgment or any other 21 judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection 22 with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation by Defendants of the federal securities 23 laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 24 523(a)(19) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(19). VIII. 25 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court 27 shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this 28 Judgment. 7 1 IX. 2 There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal 3 Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith 4 and without further notice. 5 6 Dated: January 14, 2021 7 ________________________________ 8 MARK C. SCARSI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.