Ahmed Seirafi Co-trustee of the Mohamed Seirafi Family Trust v. City of Riverside et al, No. 5:2019cv02054 - Document 76 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, 69 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants City of Riverside and James Perrys Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants City of Riverside and James Perry and against Plai ntiff Ahmed Seirafi, as co-trustee of the Mohamed Seirafi Family Trust, on all claims, with prejudice. Defendants may bring a motion to recover attorneys fees and costs pursuant to applicable statutes or contracts within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this judgment. The Court will consider any such motion and determine whether an award of fees or costs is appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ahmed Seirafi Co-trustee of the Mohamed Seirafi Family Trust v. City of Riverside et al Doc. 76 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 AHMED SEIRAFI, AS CO-TRUSTEE OF THE MOHAMED SEIRAFI FAMILY TRUST, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 CITY OF RIVERSIDE, a municipal corporation; JAMES PERRY, in his individual capacity; and DOES 1 through 20, 16 17 18 CASE NO.: 5:19-cv-2054-CAS-KKx [Assigned to Hon. Christina A. Snyder, Courtroom: 8D] FINAL JUDGMENT Defendant. 19 20 IT IS ORDERED THAT Defendants City of Riverside and James Perry’s 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in accordance with the opinion 22 issued by the Court on January 26, 2022 (ECF No. 69). 23 Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants City of Riverside and James 24 Perry and against Plaintiff Ahmed Seirafi, as co-trustee of the Mohamed Seirafi 25 Family Trust, on all claims, with prejudice. 26 Defendants City of Riverside and James Perry are the prevailing parties in 27 this action. Defendants may bring a motion to recover attorneys’ fees and costs 28 pursuant to applicable statutes or contracts within fourteen (14) days of the entry of -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 this judgment. The Court will consider any such motion and determine whether an 2 award of fees or costs is appropriate. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: February 10, 2022 5 6 7 ____ _________ Honorable Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
