Rhonda Jordan Hadden v. Andrew Saul, No. 5:2019cv01738 - Document 21 (C.D. Cal. 2020)

Court Description: JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion and Order, the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 20 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

Download PDF
Rhonda Jordan Hadden v. Andrew Saul Doc. 21 1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Case No. 5:19-cv-01738-KES RHONDA J. H., Plaintiff, JUDGMENT v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 18 IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that, for the reasons set forth in the 19 Memorandum Opinion and Order, the decision of the Commissioner of the Social 20 Security Administration is affirmed and this action is dismissed with prejudice. 21 22 23 24 DATED: July 20, 2020 ____________________________________ KAREN E. SCOTT United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.