Jay Ryland Dossey v. The People Of the State of California et al, No. 5:2019cv01705 - Document 18 (C.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 17 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice. The court takes no position on whether any subsequently filed federal habeas petition would be timely or otherwise procedurally proper. (es)

Download PDF
Jay Ryland Dossey v. The People Of the State of California et al Doc. 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAY RYLAND DOSSEY, Petitioner, 12 13 v. 14 BRIAN CATES, Warden, 15 Case No. 5:19-cv-01705-FLA (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 The court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and 2 Recommendation (“R. & R.”) of U.S. Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the 3 Petition be dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections to 4 the R. & R. have been filed. 5 The court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 6 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition 7 without prejudice. The court takes no position on whether any subsequently filed 8 federal habeas petition would be timely or otherwise procedurally proper. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 Dated: August 15, 2022 ______________________________ FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.