Mutulu Shakur v. Louis Milusnic et al, No. 5:2019cv00727 - Document 81 (C.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISRATEJUDGE by Judge Stephen V. Wilson, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Claims One, Three, and Thirteen of the Petition are DENTED; (2) Claim Two of the Petition is GRANTED; (3) the Bureau o f Prisons shall expunge Petitioner's March 2013 disciplinary conviction for a violation of Bureau of Prisons Rule 297; (4) Petitioner shall be provided with a new initial 18 U.S.C. § 4206(d) mandatory parole hearing and consideration with in 90 days of the entry of this Judgment, and the United States Parole Commission shall assess whether the two Section 4206(d) statutory exceptions to mandatory parole exist without regard to or consideration of the 2013 disciplinary conviction; ( 5) to the extent that the 2013 disciplinary conviction has been used as a basis for increasing etitioner's statutory release date under the United States Parole Commission's guidelines, any additional time so imposed shall be removed; and (6) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. re: Report and Recommendation (Issued) 79 (es)

Download PDF
Mutulu Shakur v. Louis Milusnic et al Doc. 81 81,7(' 67$7(6 ',675,&7 &2857 &(175$/ ',675,&7 2) &$/,)251,$ 0878/8 6+$.85 3HWLWLRQHU Y /28,6 0,/861,& HW DO 5HVSRQGHQWV &DVH 1R FY 69: *-6 25'(5 $&&(37,1* ),1',1*6 $1' 5(&200(1'$7,216 2) 81,7(' 67$7(6 0$*,675$7( -8'*( 3XUVXDQW WR 8 6 & WKH &RXUW KDV UHYLHZHG WKH RSHUDWLYH )LUVW $PHQGHG 3HWLWLRQ >'NW ³3HWLWLRQ´@ DOO SOHDGLQJV DQG RWKHU GRFXPHQWV ILOHG LQ WKLV DFWLRQ DQG WKH SHQGLQJ 5HSRUW DQG 5HFRPPHQGDWLRQ RI 8QLWHG 6WDWHV 0DJLVWUDWH -XGJH >'NW ³5HSRUW´@ 7KH SDUWLHV KDYH ILOHG D -RLQW 1RWLFH >'NW @ LQ ZKLFK WKH\ VWDWH WKDW WKH\ GR QRW LQWHQG WR ILOH REMHFWLRQV WR WKH 5HSRUW DQG ³VWLSXODWH DQG DJUHH WKDW WKH FDVH EH VXEPLWWHG WR WKH 'LVWULFW -XGJH IRU GLVSRVLWLRQ ZLWKRXW IXUWKHU REMHFWLRQV IURP HLWKHU SDUW\ ´ +DYLQJ FRPSOHWHG LWV UHYLHZ WKH &RXUW DFFHSWV WKH ILQGLQJV DQG UHFRPPHQGDWLRQV VHW IRUWK LQ WKH 5HSRUW $FFRUGLQJO\ ,7 ,6 25'(5(' WKDW &ODLPV 2QH 7KUHH DQG 7KLUWHHQ RI WKH 3HWLWLRQ DUH '(1,(' &ODLP 7ZR RI WKH 3HWLWLRQ LV *5$17(' WKH %XUHDX RI 3ULVRQV VKDOO H[SXQJH 3HWLWLRQHU¶V 0DUFK Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.