Adan Garcia v. Harkins Administrative Services, Inc. et al, No. 5:2018cv02314 - Document 51 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: On January 4, 2021, the Court entered an Order Granting Final Approval of the Settlement 49 . Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Final Order. This Action is ordered dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
Adan Garcia v. Harkins Administrative Services, Inc. et al Doc. 51 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ADAN GARCIA, individually, on a representative basis, and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Case No.: 5:18-cv-2314 MCS (JEMx) 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 FINAL JUDGMENT vs. 16 17 18 19 20 HARKINS ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC., an Arizona Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive; Defendants. 21 22 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of the Class Action Settlement (DE 45) as to 23 the Stipulated Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims (the “Settlement 24 Agreement”) was heard on November 2, 2020 in the above-entitled Court. On January 4, 25 2021, the Court entered an Order Granting Final Approval of the Settlement (the “Final 26 Order” at DE 49). 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: 2 1. 3 4 Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Final Order. 2. By operation of this Judgment, and in accordance with the terms of the 5 Settlement Agreement and Final Order, the Class Representatives and each of the 6 Participating Class Members (excluding those who submitted a timely Request for 7 Exclusion) shall be deemed to have fully, finally, and forever released, relinquished, and 8 discharged all Released Claims, as defined in the Settlement Agreement. For purposes of 9 this Judgment, the Court refers to all defined terms (i.e. terms with initial capitalization) 10 as set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 11 3. This Action is ordered dismissed. 12 4. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment, the Court retains exclusive 13 and continuing jurisdiction over the Action, the Class Representatives, the Class 14 Members, and Defendant for the purposes of supervising the implementation, 15 enforcement, construction, administration, and interpretation of the Settlement 16 Agreement and the Final Order. 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 21, 2021 MARK C. SCARSI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.