Josette Bastien v. 10-20 Services, Inc., No. 5:2017cv01864 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ("75,000"). Post-judgment interest shall accrue on this amount pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 beginning September 1, 2018. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 35 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Josette Bastien v. 10-20 Services, Inc. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Doc. 37 JAMES M. SHORE (SB #135945) james.shore@stoel.com BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346) bryan.hawkins@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-0700 Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 JS-6 DEC 17, 2018 Attorneys for Defendant 10-20 SERVICES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EASTERN DIVISION 11 14 15 16 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Plaintiff, 12 13 CASE NO. 5:17-cv-01864-VAP-SHK JOSETTE BASTIEN, individually, v. 10-20 SERVICES, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION; and Does 1 through 30, inclusive, Action Filed: August 7, 2017 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION SACRAMENTO 99494921.1 0059106-00003 Dockets.Justia.com 1 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION 2 Plaintiff Josette Bastien (“Plaintiff”) has commenced this action against 3 Defendant 10-20 Services, Inc. (“Defendant”) (Plaintiff and Defendants will be 4 referred to collectively as the “Parties”) alleging claims for unpaid wages and 5 wrongful termination. The Parties have agreed to the entry of this Final Judgment 6 Pursuant to Stipulation (“Judgment”) to resolve all matters in dispute in this action 7 without the completion of trial or the adjudication of any issues of law or fact. This 8 Judgment shall not constitute evidence or admission of fault or concession of 9 liability or wrongdoing by Defendant regarding any allegations of law or fact, 10 alleged either expressly or impliedly, in the Complaint. 11 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment 12 is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of SEVENTY- 13 FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS (“$75,000”). Post-judgment 14 interest shall accrue on this amount pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961 beginning 15 September 1, 2018. 16 17 18 DATED: December 17, 2018 __________________ VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, Chief United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- S TOEL R IVES LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION SACRAMENTO 99494921.1 0059106-00003
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
