Jack Robert Smith v. Harry Oreol et al, No. 5:2017cv01135 - Document 156 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. The Court now enters a full and final judgment in this action, against Plaintiff Jack Robert Smith and in favor of Defendant Jesse Henderson. As the prevailing party, Defendant Jesse Henderson is entitled to recover his costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Jack Robert Smith v. Harry Oreol et al Doc. 156 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT 13 v. 14 15 Case No. EDCV-17-1135-JFW (KK) JACK ROBERT SMITH, HARRY OREOL, ET AL., 16 Defendant(s). 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 On May 13, 2021, the Court entered an order granting Defendant Jesse Henderson’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment, Or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment (“the Motion”). That order, which describes the nature and history of this action, and the legal and factual bases for granting the Motion, is incorporated herein by reference. (“Order,” Dkt. 154.) The Order disposes of the sole cause of action against the sole defendant in this action. Accordingly, the Court now enters a full and final judgment in this action, against Plaintiff Jack Robert Smith and in favor of Defendant Jesse Henderson. 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 As the prevailing party, Defendant Jesse Henderson is entitled to recover his costs of suit. IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED. 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: May 18, 2021 ______________________________ HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
