Demus Lushan Peterson v. Eric Arnold, No. 5:2017cv00610 - Document 22 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations,, 21 : Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent warden and against petitioner Demus Lushan Peterson. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Demus Lushan Peterson v. Eric Arnold Doc. 22 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 _________________________________________ ) DEMUS LUSHAN PETERSON, ) No. ED CV 17-00610-VBF ) Plaintiffs, ) FINAL JUDGMENT ) v. ) ) ERIC ARNOLD (Warden), ) ) Respondent. ) _________________________________________) 18 Final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent warden and against 19 petitioner Demus Lushan Peterson. 20 IT IS SO ADJUDGED. 21 22 Dated: March 7, 2018 23 ______________________________ 24 Honorable Valerie Baker Fairbank Senior United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
