Mike Rios v. County of Riverside et al, No. 5:2016cv01771 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 33 by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss 15 is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer the Complaint within fourteen days of this Order. (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mike Rios v. County of Riverside et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 MIKE RIOS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________ ) Case No. ED CV 16-1771-DSF (SP) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, records 19 on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. 20 Defendants have not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time 21 permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate 22 Judge. 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants' Motion to Dismiss (docket 24 no. 15) is denied. Defendants are ordered to answer the Complaint within fourteen 25 days of this Order. 26 27 DATED: March 14, 2018 28 ______________________________ HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
