Sream, Inc. v. Taham LLC, et al., No. 5:2015cv02452 - Document 12 (C.D. Cal. 2015)

Court Description: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT R&J MARKET & SMOKE SHOP, INC. by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, Stipulation for Permanent Injunction 11 . (mrgo)

Download PDF
Sream, Inc. v. Taham LLC, et al. Doc. 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SREAM, INC, a California corporation, Case No. EDCV 15-2452-VAP (SPx) 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. TAHAM LLC; R&J MARKET & SMOKE SHOP, INC.; AKRAM ALAWDI; and DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT R&J MARKET & SMOKE SHOP, INC. Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 1 2 3 4 This Court, having made the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to the parties’ stipulation: A. Plaintiff Sream, Inc. (“Sream” or “Plaintiff”) filed suit against Defendant R&J 5 MARKET & SMOKE SHOP, INC. (“RJ Smoke”), alleging that RJ Smoke violated 6 Sream’s rights under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, 1116, 1125(a), (c), and (d), and Cal. Bus & Prof. § 7 17200 et seq. (“Action”); 8 9 10 11 B. The Parties entered into a settlement agreement as of December 11, 2015 (“Settlement Agreement”), which requires entry of the stipulated judgment set forth herein; And good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT: 12 1. That judgment be entered in favor of Sream against RJ Smoke on all claims. 13 2. For the purposes of binding preclusive effect on RJ Smoke as to future 14 disputes between RJ Smoke and Sream, and only for such purposes, RJ Smoke admits the 15 following: 16 a. Mr. Martin Birzle is now, and has been at all times since the dates of issuance, 17 the owner of United States Trademark Registration Nos. 2,235,638; 2,307,176; 18 and 3,675,839 (the “RooR Marks”) and of all rights thereto and thereunder. 19 b. The RooR Marks are valid and enforceable. 20 c. Since at least 2013, Plaintiff Sream has been the exclusive licensee of the 21 RooR Marks in the United States. Mr. Birzle has been granted all 22 enforcement rights to Sream to sue for obtain injunctive and monetary relief 23 for past and future infringement of the RooR Marks. d. RJ Smoke, by the actions described in the complaint, has infringed upon the 24 RooR Marks. 25 26 3. RJ Smoke, and those acting on RJ Smoke’s behalf (including its owners, 27 shareholders, principals, officers, agents, servants, employees, independent contractors, and 28 partners), are permanently enjoined from producing, manufacturing, distributing, selling, 2 JUDGMENT 1 offer for sale, advertising, promoting, licensing, or marketing (a) any product bearing the 2 RooR Marks or (b) any design, mark, or feature that is confusingly similar to the RooR 3 Marks (collectively, the “Injunction”). 4 4. RJ Smoke is bound by the Injunction regardless of whether Mr. Martin Birzle 5 assigns or licenses its intellectual property rights to another for so long as such trademark 6 rights are subsisting, valid, and enforceable. The Injunction inures to the benefit of Mr. 7 Martin Birzle’s successors, assignees, and licensees. 8 9 5. This Court (or if this Court is unavailable, any court within the Central District of California) shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the Parties 10 arising out of the Settlement Agreement and Injunction, the Stipulation which includes the 11 Injunction, and this final judgment, including but not limited to interpretation and 12 enforcement of the terms of the Settlement Agreement. 13 14 6. The Parties waive any rights to appeal this stipulated judgment, including without limitation the Injunction. 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 Dated: December 15, 2015 20 Virginia A. Phillips United States District Court Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.