The Tire Hanger Corporation v. Rotary Lift et al, No. 5:2015cv02347 - Document 258 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. An AMENDED JUDGMENT is hereby entered jointly and severally against Defendants Rotary Lift dba Vehicle Service Group, LLC and Snap-On, Inc. dba Equipment Solutions: Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporatio n was awarded $12,525.00 for damages; awarded prejudgment interest in the amount of $1,252.50; costs in the amount of $4,152.81. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation is the prevailing party, entitled to an award of its attorneys fees in the amount of $600,000.00, Dkt. 256 . Related to: Stipulation to Amend/Correct 257 . SEE DOCUMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. (twdb)

Download PDF

The Tire Hanger Corporation v. Rotary Lift et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOHN D. VAN LOBEN SELS (SBN: 201354) jvanlobensels@fishiplaw.com JENNIFER J. SHIH (SBN: 276225) jshih@fishiplaw.com Fish IP Law, LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 200 Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 517-9800 Facsimile: (650) 517-9898 Attorney for Plaintiff, THE TIRE HANGER CORPORATION 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 THE TIRE HANGER CORPORATION, a California corporation; 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 18 19 20 21 Doc. 258 Case No. 5:15-cv-02347-JGB-SP AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT Courtroom: Judge: 1 Hon. Jesus G. Bernal ROTARY LIFT dba VEHICLE SERVICE GROUP, LLC, a Division of Dover Industries, an Indiana corporation; and SNAP-ON, INC. dba EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS, a Delaware corporation. Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 The above-entitled case came on regularly for trial on July 10, 2018, in Courtroom 2 1 at 3470 Twelfth Street, Riverside, CA 92501, with the Honorable Jesus Bernal, United 3 States District Court Judge, presiding. 4 On October 4, 2018, the Court entered judgment in this matter. Dkt. 231. On 5 January 4, 2019, the Clerk issued Bill of Costs, taxing costs in the amount of $4,152.81. 6 Dkt. 254. On January 14, 2019, the Court awarded Plaintiff’s counsel attorneys’ fees in 7 the amount of $600,000.00. Dkt. 256. 8 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED THAT on based upon the jury’s verdict, ECF No. 200, the Clerk’s Bill of Costs, Dkt. 254, and the 10 Court’s Order awarding Plaintiff’s counsel attorneys’ fees in the amount of $600,000.00, 11 Dkt. 256; an AMENDED JUDGMENT is hereby entered jointly and severally against 12 Defendants Rotary Lift dba Vehicle Service Group, LLC and Snap-On, Inc. dba 13 Equipment Solutions: 14 1. Prior to trial, the Court ruled Defendants breached the Settlement Agreement in 15 regards to the Licensed Products as a matter of law. Dkt. 127. The Court also 16 ruled that Defendants did not breach the Settlement Agreement in regards to 17 the Wheel Wing as a matter of law. Id. 18 2. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation was awarded $12,525.00 for damages 19 resulting from a breach of contract in accord with the jury’s verdict rendered on 20 July 13, 2018; Defendants paid this amount on October 8, 2018. 21 3. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation was awarded prejudgment interest in the 22 amount of $1,252.50; Defendants paid this amount on October 8, 2018. 23 4. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation is the prevailing party, entitled to an 24 award of its costs in the amount of $4,152.81, Dkt. 254, under the Clerk’s Bill 25 of Costs, Dkt. 254. 26 27 5. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation is the prevailing party, entitled to an award of its attorneys’ fees in the amount of $600,000.00, Dkt. 256. 28 1 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT 1 2 6. Plaintiff The Tire Hanger Corporation is awarded post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. §1961. 3 7. This court (or if this Court is unavailable, any court within the Central District 4 of California) shall retain jurisdiction over all disputes between and among the 5 Parties arising out of this final judgment, including but not limited to 6 enforcement of the judgment. 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 12 Dated: February 5, 2019 13 _________________________________ Honorable Jesus G. Bernal United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cc: FISCAL 2 AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.