Richard Scott Elsmore v. California Highway Patrol et al, No. 5:2015cv01556 - Document 99 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. The Court denies Plaintiffs request to stay the civil action pending his state court criminal appeal. (Docket # 95, 97.) IT IS ORDERED that action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. (See Order for further details) (vm)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Richard Scott Elsmore v. California Highway Patrol et al Doc. 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 RICHARD SCOTT ELSMORE, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., 17 18 Case No. ED CV 15-1556 RGK (MRW) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the amended complaint, the records on file, and the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Court denies Plaintiff’s request to stay the civil action pending his state court criminal appeal. (Docket # 95, 97.) 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 IT IS ORDERED that action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. 3 4 5 6 DATE: April 22, 2021 ___________________________________ HON. R. GARY KLAUSNER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
