Michael O DeVaughn v. John McDonell, No. 5:2015cv00577 - Document 98 (C.D. Cal. 2017)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr for Motion for Leave to Amend 73 , Report and Recommendation (Issued), 95 . The Court concludes that nothing in the Objection affects or alters the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report and accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. (ec)
Download PDF
Michael O DeVaughn v. John McDonell Doc. 98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN, 12 13 14 15 Petitioner v. JOHN MCDONELL, Respondent. Case No. EDCV 15-577-TJH (GJS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Petitioner’s motion for 19 leave to amend [Dkt. 73-74, the “Motion”] and the parties’ related briefing and 20 lodgments [Dkt. 76-77, 82], the operative habeas petition in this case [Dkt. 1, 21 “Petition”], the pleadings and other documents filed in this action, the Report and 22 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 95, “Report”], and 23 Petitioner’s Objection to the Report [Dkt. 97]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) 24 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those 25 portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. 26 27 The Court concludes that nothing in the Objection affects or alters the 28 analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report and accepts the findings and Dockets.Justia.com 1 recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the 2 Motion is DENIED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 DATED: November 6, 2017 __________________________________ TERRY J. HATTER, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2