Michael O DeVaughn v. John McDonell, No. 5:2015cv00577 - Document 136 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Terry J. Hatter, Jr, Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. re: Report and Recommendation (Issued) 120 . [See document for details.] (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Michael O DeVaughn v. John McDonell Doc. 136 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL O. DEVAUGHN, 12 13 14 15 Petitioner v. JOHN McDONNELL, Respondent. Case No. 5:15-cv-00577-TJH (GJS) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 28 U.S.C. § 2254 18 petition in this case ([Dkt. 1-3, “Petition”) and all relevant pleadings, motions, and 19 other documents filed in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United 20 States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 120, “Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the 21 Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 135). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and 22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of the matters to 23 which objections have been stated. 24 Petitioner’s assertions and arguments have been reviewed carefully. The 25 Court concludes that nothing set forth in the Objections or otherwise in the record 26 for this case affects or alters, or calls into question, the findings and analysis set 27 forth in the Report. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and 28 recommendations set forth in the Report. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
