Altheia Taylor v. County of San Bernardino Human Services, No. 5:2009cv01829 - Document 56 (C.D. Cal. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Margaret M. Morrow for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 52 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of C ivil Procedure; (2) the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment shall enter dismissing this action with prejudice as to plaintiffs federal claims and without prejudice as to plaintiffs state law claims. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz)

Download PDF
Altheia Taylor v. County of San Bernardino Human Services Doc. 56 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 ALTHEIA TAYLOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________) NO. EDCV 09-1829-MMM (MAN) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second 19 Amended Complaint, defendant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended 20 Complaint 21 Recommendation 22 plaintiff’s Objections to the Report. 23 review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been 24 stated in writing. 25 set forth in the Report. (“Motion”), of all United of the States records Magistrate herein, Judge the Report and (“Report”), and The Court has conducted a de novo The Court accepts the findings and recommendations 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is granted pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) the Second Amended Dockets.Justia.com 1 Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment shall 2 enter dismissing this action with prejudice as to plaintiff’s federal 3 claims and without prejudice as to plaintiff’s state law claims. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 DATED: September 23, 2012. 8 9 10 MARGARET M. MORROW UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.