Desert Commercial Bank v. Corie K Blount et al, No. 5:2008cv00279 - Document 35 (C.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 1) Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Desert Commercial Bank and against Defendants Corie K. Blount and Nicole Blount, jointly and severally, in the sum of $1,119,213.20. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo)

Download PDF
Desert Commercial Bank v. Corie K Blount et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 Doc. 35 Thomas S. Slovak (SBN 062815) E-mail: nadell@sbelawyers.com; Brent S. Clemmer (SBN 179722) E-mail: clemmer@sbelawyers.com JS-6 SLOVAK, BARON & EMPEY, LLP 1800 East Tahquitz Canyon Way Palm Springs, CA 92262 Telephone: (760) 322-2275 / Facsimile: (760) 322-2107 Attorneys for Plaintiff DESERT COMMERCIAL BANK 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 DESERT COMMERCIAL BANK, a State Chartered Bank 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 18 v. CORIE K. BLOUNT, an individual; NICOLE BLOUNT, an individual; Defendants. 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: EDCV 08- 00279 VAP (JCRx) [Hon. Virginia A. Phillips, Judge Courtroom 2] [Complaint filed: March 3, 2008] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT Date: September 15, 2008 Time: 10:00 a.m. Dept.: Courtroom 2 21 22 In the above entitled cause, Plaintiff Desert Commercial Bank and Defendants 23 Corie K. Blount and Nicole Blount having stipulated that judgment be entered 24 against Defendants Corie K. Blount and Nicole Blount, jointly and severally, and in 25 favor of Plaintiff Desert Commercial Bank, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: 26 27 /// 28 /// ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Desert Commercial Bank and 2 against Defendants Corie K. Blount and Nicole Blount, jointly and severally, in the 3 sum of $1,119,213.20. 4 5 6 Dated: September 12, 2008 ___________________________________ Hon. Virginia A. Phillips Judge United States District Court 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT 1 PROOF OF SERVICE 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 3 4 5 6 7 I, the undersigned, am employed in the County of Riverside, California, am over the age of 18 years and not a party to this lawsuit. My business address is 1800 East Tahquitz Canyon., Palm Springs, California 92262. On September 12, 2008, I served or caused to be served the foregoing document described as: [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT on all interested parties in this action as follows: 8 9 10 11 12 13 Rodey W. Bell, Esq. Chang & Coté, LLP 19138 Walnut Drive, Suite 100 Rowland Heights, California 91748 Tel: (626) 854-2112 Ext. 108 Fax: (626) 854-2120 rbell@changcote.com Raul B. Garcia, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF RAUL B. GARCIA 111 East State Street, Suite 201 Redlands, CA 92415 Tel: (909) 747-0380 Fax: (909)747-0383 raul@raulbgarcia.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (X ) BY EMAIL: I served via electronic email to the following Email addresses: rbell@changcote.com and raul@raulbgarcia.com (X) BY FACSIMILE: I transmitted such document by facsimile from Palm Springs, California, to the facsimile machine maintained by the above person(s) at Fax: (626) 8542120 and Fax: (909)747-0383 as last indicated by that person on a document that he or she has filed in the above-entitled cause and served on this party. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and State of California that the above is true and correct. 24 25 Executed on September 12, 2008 at Palm Springs, California. 26 27 ERIKA M. GARDUNO 28 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.