S. V. A. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al, No. 5:2006cv00555 - Document 93 (C.D. Cal. 2008)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stephen G. Larson: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: (1) Plaintiffs SAVANNA VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guardian ad Litem,LIDIA SILVA ARRUDA, JOYCE ANN ARRUDA, and RICARDO ARRUDA take nothing against defendants COUNTY OF LO S ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO. (2) Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO shall have judgment against plaintiffs SAVANNA VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guard ian ad Litem, LIDIA SILVA ARRUDA, JOYCE ANN ARRUDA, and RICARDO ARRUDA. (3) Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO are entitled to costs as determined by the cost bill to be submitted by defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ad)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
S. V. A. et al v. County of Los Angeles et al Doc. 93 O 1 2 3 ENTERED JS-6 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, EASTERN DIVISION 10 11 SAVANNA VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guardian Ad Litem, LIDIA SILVA 12 ARRUDA, JOYCE ANN ARRUDA, RICARDO ARRUDA, LISA MARIE 13 DUMONT, Plaintiffs, 14 15 CASE NO. EDCV 06-00555 SGL (OPx) FINAL JUDGMENT Hon. Stephen G. Larson Courtroom "1" - Riverside v. 16 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS 17 DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO, individually and as a peace 18 officer, DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN: 22 The Motion for Summary Judgment, or alternatively, for Partial Summary 23 Judgment/Summary Adjudication on behalf of defendants COUNTY OF LOS 24 ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and 25 DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO came on regularly for hearing on June 2, 2008 at 10:00 26 a.m. in Courtroom "1" of the above-entitled Court before the Honorable Judge 27 Stephen G. Larson presiding. Rittu Kumar, Esq. of Hurrell Cantrall, LLP appeared 28 on behalf of defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY Final Judgment.doc Dockets.Justia.com 1 SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO and Thomas E. 2 Beck, Esq. of The Beck Law Firm appeared on behalf of plaintiffs SAVANNA 3 VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guardian Ad Litem, LIDIA SILVA ARRUDA, JOYCE 4 ANN ARRUDA, and RICARDO ARRUDA. Based on the evidence presented 5 having been fully considered, the issues having been duly heard, and a decision 6 having been duly rendered by way of this Court's August 5, 2008 Order granting 7 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and ordering entry of judgment as 8 requested in defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 9 10 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: (1) Plaintiffs SAVANNA VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guardian ad Litem, 11 LIDIA SILVA ARRUDA, JOYCE ANN ARRUDA, and RICARDO ARRUDA 12 take nothing against defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES 13 COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO. 14 (2) Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES 15 COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO shall 16 have judgment against plaintiffs SAVANNA VIOLET ARRUDA, by her Guardian 17 ad Litem, LIDIA SILVA ARRUDA, JOYCE ANN ARRUDA, and RICARDO 18 ARRUDA. 19 (3) Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES 20 COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, and DEPUTY RYAN ANGULO are 21 entitled to costs as determined by the cost bill to be submitted by defendants. 22 23 24 DATED: October 10, 2008 25 26 HONORABLE JUDGE STEPHEN G. LARSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 Final Judgment.doc -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
