Adrian Jules v. Andre Balazs et al, No. 2:2023cv09478 - Document 49 (C.D. Cal. 2024)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. For the reasons stated in the separate order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss entered April 12, 2024, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Adrian Jules's claims against Defendants Andre Balazs and Chateau Holdings, Ltd., doing business as Chateau Marmont, are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. This is a final judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rolm)

Download PDF
Adrian Jules v. Andre Balazs et al Doc. 49 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ADRIAN JULES, Case No. 2:23-cv-09478-SB-MAR Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT v. ANDRE BALAZS et al., Defendants. For the reasons stated in the separate order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss entered April 12, 2024, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Adrian Jules’s claims against Defendants Andre Balazs and Chateau Holdings, Ltd., doing business as Chateau Marmont, are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. This is a final judgment. Date: April 15, 2024 ___________________________ Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.