Randall Hinton v. Birkholtz et al, No. 2:2022cv07755 - Document 8 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II for NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case 5 , Report and Recommendation (Issued), 7 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing the action without prejudice. (es)

Download PDF
Randall Hinton v. Birkholtz et al Doc. 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDALL HINTON, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:22-cv-07755-ODW-AFM Petitioner, v. BRYAN BIRKHOLTZ, et al., Respondents. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States 19 Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation 20 has passed, and Objections have not been received. The Court accepts the findings 21 and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 22 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the 23 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing the action without prejudice. 24 25 26 27 DATED: February 24, 2023 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.