GS Holistic, LLC v. Smokeyz Inc et al, No. 2:2022cv05651 - Document 31 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff on all claims, and Defendants are liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $150,897.00 (statutory damages of $150,000.00 plus costs of $897.50). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smokeyz Inc et al Doc. 31 1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GS HOLISTIC, LLC, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:22-cv-05651-JFW-GJSx Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT SMOKEYZ INC d/b/a SMOKEYZ SMOKE AND VAPE SHOP and ELIAN HANNA, 16 Defendants, 17 18 The Court has before it the Plaintiff, GS HOLISTIC, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for 19 20 21 Default Judgment against Defendants, SMOKEYZ INC d/b/a SMOKEYZ SMOKE AND VAPE SHOP and ELIAN HANNA (collectively, “Defendants”). Having considered Plaintiff’s Motion 22 and all documents and evidence attached thereto, and the Court being fully advised, and good 23 cause shown: 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff on all claims, and Defendants are liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $150,897.00 26 (statutory damages of $150,000.00 plus costs of $897.50). 27 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants, their 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 agents, employees, officers, directors, owners, representatives, successor companies, related 2 companies, and all persons acting in concern or participation with it are permanently restrained and 3 enjoined from infringing upon the Stündenglass Marks directly or contributorily, in any manner, 4 including but not limited to: 5 6 (a) Import, export, making, manufacture, reproduction, assembly, use, acquisition, purchase, 7 offer, sale, transfer, brokerage, consignment, distribution, storage, shipment, licensing, 8 development, display, delivery, marketing advertising or promotion of the counterfeit 9 Stündenglass product identified in the complaint and any other unauthorized Stündenglass 10 11 product, counterfeit, copy or colorful imitation thereof; (b) Assisting, aiding or attempting to assist or aid any other person or entity in performing any 12 13 14 of the prohibited activities referred to in Paragraphs (a) above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 15 §1118, Defendants, at their cost, deliver to Plaintiff for destruction all products, accessories, labels, 16 signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, advertisements, and other material in their 17 possession, custody or control bearing any of the Stündenglass Marks. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 DATED: February 16, 2023 ____________________________ United States District Court Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
