Maria De Jesus Cruz Ramos v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al, No. 2:2022cv03579 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted; Defendant's motion for sanctions 18 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 is granted in part and denied in part. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Maria De Jesus Cruz Ramos v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al Doc. 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA DE JESUS CRUZ RAMOS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-03579-MWF (AFMx) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and 19 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections 20 to the Report and Recommendation has passed, and Objections have not been 21 received. 22 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that 23 (1) The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted; 24 (2) Defendant’s motion for sanctions (Docket No. 18) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 25 P. 37 is granted in part and denied in part as set out herein; 26 (3) Defendant’s request for a default judgment or for an order striking 27 pleadings, finding facts to be taken as established, or prohibiting Plaintiff from 28 supporting her claims or responding to defenses or from introducing evidence on Dockets.Justia.com 1 designated matters is denied; 2 (4) Within 21 days of the date of the order accepting this Report and 3 Recommendation, it is ordered that Plaintiff shall respond to the pending 4 interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admission; shall produce all 5 responsive documents; and shall provide her initial disclosures and expert 6 disclosures; 7 8 (5) Plaintiff is ordered to be made available for her deposition as requested by Defendant; 9 (6) The case deadlines be extended to permit the discovery responses, 10 document production, and disclosures by Plaintiff to take place and to permit 11 sufficient time for Defendant to take Plaintiff’s deposition and to conduct follow-up 12 investigation and discovery; 13 14 (7) Plaintiff shall reimburse Defendant in the amount of $7,500 for attorneys’ fees and other expenses incurred regarding the motion; and 15 (8) Counsel at DTLA be referred to the State Bar of California and the Central 16 District of California Standing Committee on Discipline for consideration of DTLA’s 17 abandonment of Plaintiff in this lawsuit prior to their disqualification. 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: May 23, 2023 ____________________________________ MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
