Gwenique Williams v. OGara Coach, LLC et al, No. 2:2022cv02928 - Document 84 (C.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: For the reasons set forth in the Court's separate Order Granting In Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss 83 , it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Gwenique Williams take nothing on her 4 2 U.S.C. Section 1985(3) claim for conspiracy to interfere with civil rights against Defendants O'Gara Coach, LLC, Evan Paul Auto Capital, LLC, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars N.A., LLC, and Merchants Bonding Company. This claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in state court. This is a Final Judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Gwenique Williams v. OGara Coach, LLC et al Doc. 84 1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Case No. 2:22-cv-02928-SB-JPR GWENIQUE WILLIAMS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. 15 18 O’GARA COACH, LLC, EVAN PAUL AUTO CAPITAL, LLC, MERCHANTS BONDING CO., and ROLLS-ROYCE MOTOR CARS N.A., LLC 19 Defendants. 16 17 FINAL JUDGMENT 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 For the reasons set forth in the Court’s separate Order Granting In Part Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 83, it is: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Gwenique Williams take nothing on her 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) claim for conspiracy to interfere with civil rights against Defendants O’Gara Coach, LLC, Evan Paul Auto Capital, LLC, Rolls-Royce Motor Cars N.A., LLC, and Merchants Bonding Company. This claim is DISMISSED with 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 prejudice. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the remaining state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to refiling in state court. This is a Final Judgment. 5 6 Dated: July 18, 2022 7 8 Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.