Christopher Stone v. City of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2022cv01150 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING COUNTY'S MOTION TO DISMISS 21 AND CITYS MOTION TO DISMISS 24 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the aforementioned reasons, the Court GRANTS the City's and County's motions to dismiss, (ECF Nos. 21 , 24 ), wi th leave to amend the FAC as described above. If Stone chooses to file a Second Amended Complaint, he must do so within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order, in which case Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond no later than fourt een (14) days from the date the Second Amended Complaint is filed. If Stone chooses not to amend, his claims shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice and the case shall be closed as of the lapse of the amendment deadline. Moreover, the Federal Pro Se Clinic offers free guidance to individuals representing themselves in federal civil actions. The Court encourages Stone to visit the Clinic or otherwise consult with an attorney prior to amending his FAC. See order for details. (lom)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.