Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino, No. 2:2022cv00632 - Document 13 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEEMING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION by Judge Percy Anderson. Plaintiff Brigette Huit (also known as Brigette Michelle Huit and Brigette Michelle Huit Brownbey) is deemed a vexatious litigant. This action is dismissed with prejudice. See Order re Request to Proceed In Form Pauperis. (iv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brigette Huit v. Frank Trevino Doc. 13 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 BRIGETTE HUIT, 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. FRANK TREVINO, 16 Defendant. 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 22-0632-PA (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEEMING PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 20 Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time 21 allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the 22 Magistrate Judge. 23 IT IS ORDERED: 24 (1) Plaintiff Brigette Huit (also known as Brigette Michelle Huit and Brigette Michelle 25 26 27 Huit Brownbey) is deemed a vexatious litigant. (2) The Clerk of the Court shall not is ordered not to accept f or filing any complaint or other initiating document submitted by Brigette Huit (also known as Brigette Michelle Huit, 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 and Brigette Michelle Huit Brownbey) against Frank Trevino, University of Southern 2 California, Security Industry Specialist, Inc., the Department of Homeland Security, Riquino 3 Smith, United States District Court employees, or federal or state official without Huit first 4 filing a Motion for Leave to File a Complaint and a Judge of this Court having granted Huit 5 leave to file such a Complaint or other initiating document. 6 (3) Plaintiff must submit a copy of this vexatious litigant order and a copy of the 7 proposed filing with any motion seeking leave of court to file a complaint or other initiating 8 document. 9 10 11 12 (4) Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. See Order re Request to Proceed In Form Pauperis. (5) This action is dismissed with prejudice. See Order re Request to Proceed In Form Pauperis. 13 14 DATED: April 1, 2022 PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
