T.A. v. County of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2021cv09757 - Document 37 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: For the reasons stated in the separate order granting Defendant County of Los Angeles's motion for summary judgment entered this day, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff T.A., by and through her guardian ad litem, Liana Harmandjian, shall take nothing on her claim against Defendant County of Los Angeles, and her claim against the County is DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Adrienne Zachery are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. This is a final judgment. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
T.A. v. County of Los Angeles et al Doc. 37 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. 2:21-cv-09757-SB-PD T.A., FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendant. For the reasons stated in the separate order granting Defendant County of Los Angeles’s motion for summary judgment entered this day, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff T.A., by and through her guardian ad litem, Liana Harmandjian, shall take nothing on her claim against Defendant County of Los Angeles, and her claim against the County is DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. It is further ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Adrienne Zachery are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution. This is a final judgment. Date: February 2, 2023 ___________________________ Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.