Stitch Editing Ltd. v. TikTok, Inc. et al, No. 2:2021cv06636 - Document 522 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: Pursuant to the 3/9/2023 jury verdict and Stitch Editing Ltd.s (Stitch Editing) voluntary dismissal with prejudice of TikTok LLC and TikTok Ltd., entered on 2/28/2023, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, A ND DECREED as follows: Final judgment is entered in favor of TikTok Inc., TikTok LLC, TikTok Ltd., and ByteDance Ltd. and against Stitch Editing on all of Stitch Editing's claims: federal trademark infringement, federal unfair competition, Calif ornia common law unfair competition, and unfair competition under the California Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17200 et seq. Stitch Editing shall recover nothing on any of its claims. It is further ORDERED that pursuant to the Court's 11/15/2022 ord er granting in part and denying in part the parties' joint motion for summary judgment, Defendants' counterclaim for cancellation of Stitch Editing's registered STITCH EDITING mark is dismissed on the merits with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Stitch Editing Ltd. v. TikTok, Inc. et al Doc. 522 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 11 STITCH EDITING LTD., Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 2:21-CV-06636-SB-SK FINAL JUDGMENT v. TIKTOK INC., TIKTOK LLC, TIKTOK LTD., and BYTEDANCE LTD., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to the March 9, 2023 jury verdict and Stitch Editing Ltd.’s (“Stitch 2 Editing”) voluntary dismissal with prejudice of TikTok LLC and TikTok Ltd., entered 3 on February 28, 2023, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as 4 follows: 5 Final judgment is entered in favor of TikTok Inc., TikTok LLC, TikTok Ltd., and 6 ByteDance Ltd. and against Stitch Editing on all of Stitch Editing’s claims: federal 7 trademark infringement, federal unfair competition, California common law unfair 8 competition, and unfair competition under the California Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et 9 seq. Stitch Editing shall recover nothing on any of its claims. 10 It is further ORDERED that pursuant to the Court’s November 15, 2022 order 11 granting in part and denying in part the parties’ joint motion for summary judgment, 12 Defendants’ counterclaim for cancellation of Stitch Editing’s registered STITCH 13 EDITING mark is dismissed on the merits with prejudice. 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: March 14, 2023 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.