Edwin Ivan Guardia v. Prestige Default Services et al, No. 2:2021cv06447 - Document 57 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: For the reasons set forth in the separate Order of Dismissal 56 , it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Edwin Ivan Guardia's claim under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against Defendants Prestige Default Servi ces; Briana Young; Ghidotti Berger, LLP and its employees; Michelle Rene Ghidotti, aka Michelle Ghidotti-Gonsalves; Chase Berger; Redwood Holdings, LLC and its employees; Sam Chandra; and the Law Offices of Sam Chandra and its employees is DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims, and Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Edwin Ivan Guardia v. Prestige Default Services et al Doc. 57 October 14, 2021 -6 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Case No. 2:21-cv-06447-SB-MRW EDWIN IVAN GUARDIA, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT v. 9 10 PRESTIGE DEFAULT SERVICES ET AL., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 For the reasons set forth in the separate Order of Dismissal entered this day, it is 16 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Edwin Ivan Guardia’s claim under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants Prestige Default Services; Briana Young; Ghidotti 18 Berger, LLP and its employees; Michelle Rene Ghidotti, aka Michelle Ghidotti- 19 Gonsalves; Chase Berger; Redwood Holdings, LLC and its employees; Sam Chandra; 20 and the Law Offices of Sam Chandra and its employees is DISMISSED on the merits 21 with prejudice. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over 22 Plaintiff’s state law claims, and Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED without 23 prejudice. 24 This is a Final Judgment. 25 26 27 Dated: October 14, 2021 _______________________________________ STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.