Shizhe Shen et al v. Irene Martin et al, No. 2:2021cv06244 - Document 33 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar, in favor of Alejandro Mayorkas, Irene Martin, Merrick B. Garland, Tracy Renaud against Chaoran Yu, Shizhe Shen Related to: Memorandum Opinion and Order Directing Judgment in favor of Defendants 32 . IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Judgment is entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants on all claims alleged in the Complaint, and that the above-captioned case is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Shizhe Shen et al v. Irene Martin et al Doc. 33 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 SHIZHE SHEN and CHAORAN YU, 11 Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CASE NO. CV 21-6244 AS JUDGMENT v. IRENE MARTIN, San Bernardino Field Office Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security; MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, Defendants. 19 20 Pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order Directing 21 22 Judgment in favor of Defendants, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that 23 Judgment is entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendants 24 25 26 // // 27 28 // Dockets.Justia.com 1 on all claims alleged in the Complaint, and that the above- 2 captioned case is dismissed with prejudice. 3 4 DATED: April 18, 2022 5 /s/ __________ ALKA SAGAR UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
