De'Asia Niblett v. Universal Protection Service, LP et al, No. 2:2021cv03151 - Document 62 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: For the reasons set forth in the separate Order on Motions to Dismiss 61 , it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff De'Asia Niblett shall take nothing on her federal claims against Defendants Co unty of Los Angeles, Universal Protection Service, LP, and J. Rodriguez. Plaintiff's claims for violations of 42 U.S.C. Sections 1983 and 2000a are DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
De&#039;Asia Niblett v. Universal Protection Service, LP et al Doc. 62 October 5, 2021 JS-6 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Case No. 2:21-cv-03151-SB-RAO DE’ASIA NIBLETT, 6 7 8 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT v. 9 10 UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP ET AL., 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 15 16 For the reasons set forth in the separate Order on Motions to Dismiss entered today, it is 17 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff De’Asia Niblett shall take nothing 18 on her federal claims against Defendants County of Los Angeles, Universal Protection 19 Service, LP, and J. Rodriguez. Plaintiff’s claims for violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 20 and 2000a are DISMISSED on the merits with prejudice. Plaintiff’s state law claims 21 are DISMISSED without prejudice. 22 23 This is a Final Judgment. Dated: October 5, 2021 24 Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr. United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
