Omar King v. L. Kingsley et al, No. 2:2020cv10459 - Document 35 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 32 , NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies 22 . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Omar King v. L. Kingsley et al Doc. 35 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 OMAR KING, Case No. 2:20-cv-10459-FLA (JEM) 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 L. KINGSLEY, et al., 15 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendants. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the pleadings, the 19 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 20 Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the court has reviewed de 21 novo those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has 22 objected. The Objections are OVERRULED, and the court accepts the findings 23 and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 24 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is 25 GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without 26 prejudice. Dated: April 13, 2022 27 28 ______________________________ FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
