A.B. v. Facebook, Inc. et al, No. 2:2020cv09012 - Document 68 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: Consistent with the Courts June 1, 2021 order granting Defendants Facebook and WhatsApps motion to dismiss with prejudice (Dkt. No. 49), the Courts June 16, 2021 order dismissing Plaintiffs claims against the remaining Defendants with prejudice (Dkt. No. 54), and the Courts minute order granting Defendants Motion for Entry of Final Judgment andto Compel Disclosure of Plaintiffs True Name, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 final judgment is entered on all claims in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff Randy Cervantes. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action against Defendants. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

Download PDF
A.B. v. Facebook, Inc. et al Doc. 68 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 10 RANDY CERVANTES, 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO. 2:20-CV-09012-CBM-MAAx FINAL JUDGMENT [JS-6] Before: Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall FACEBOOK, INC., WHATSAPP, INC., 247FOREXTRADE Also Known As 4REXTRADE, ROSE LUND, JANE DOE, AND DOES 1 Through 100, Inclusive, Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. 2:20-CV-09012-CBM-MAA Dockets.Justia.com 1 Consistent with the Court’s June 1, 2021 order granting Defendants Facebook and 2 WhatsApp’s motion to dismiss with prejudice (Dkt. No. 49), the Court’s June 16, 2021 order 3 dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants with prejudice (Dkt. No. 54), 4 and the Court’s minute order granting Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and 5 to Compel Disclosure of Plaintiff’s True Name, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 58 final judgment is entered on all claims in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff 7 Randy Cervantes. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his action against Defendants. 8 9 DATED: November 15, 2021 10 11 HON. CONSUELO B. MARSHALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP -2FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. 2:20-CV-09012-CBM-MAA

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.