Shane Douglas Sichting v. Patricia V. Bradley, No. 2:2020cv08142 - Document 18 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 10 by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Having reviewed de novo those portions or the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner objected, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and judgment be entered dismissing this action. To the extent one is even authorized given that this is a disguised civil-rights action, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. [See document for further details.] (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Shane Douglas Sichting v. Patricia V. Bradley Doc. 18 Case 2:20-cv-08142-DSF-JPR Document 18 Filed 09/20/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:373 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANE DOUGLAS SICHTING, Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 STEVE KALLIS, Warden,1 Respondent. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 20–8142-DSF (JPR) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the 19 Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. 20 Magistrate Judge. On August 30, 2021, Petitioner filed 21 objections to the R. & R., and on September 14 Respondent 22 responded. 23 In his Objections, Petitioner continues to complain about 24 the medical treatment he received at FCI Lompoc (see, e.g., Objs. 25 at 3, 5), which the Magistrate Judge correctly explained should 26 27 28 1 As noted herein, Petitioner has been transferred to the Federal Medical Center in Rochester, Minnesota, where Steve Kallis is the Warden. He is therefore substituted in as the proper Respondent. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:20-cv-08142-DSF-JPR Document 18 Filed 09/20/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:374
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
