Michael Lee Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security, No. 2:2020cv04918 - Document 26 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: JUDGMENT OF REMAND by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, Related to: Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand 25 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Michael Lee Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 26 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL L. A. 1, an Individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No.: 2:20-04918 ADS JUDGMENT OF REMAND KILOLO KIJAKAZI2, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 2 The Complaint, and thus the docket caption, do not name the current Acting Commissioner. The parties list Andrew M. Saul as the Commissioner in the Joint Stipulation. On July 9, 2021, Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Thus, he is automatically substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). 1 -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 25, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of 4 Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further 5 proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. 6 7 DATE: October 26, 2021 8 9 /s/ Autumn D. Spaeth THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
