Leah Kando v. City of Long Beach et al, No. 2:2020cv04520 - Document 88 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Stanley Blumenfeld, Jr.: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Leah Kando shall take nothing on her claims against Defendants City of Long Beach, Lindsey Taylor-Law, Alfredo Magana, Nadia Klute, Michael Ogden, and Jesus Valdez. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (gk)

Download PDF
Leah Kando v. City of Long Beach et al Doc. 88 October 1, 2021 JS-6 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Case No. 2:20-cv-04520-SB-E LEAH KANDO 6 7 8 Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT v. 9 10 11 CITY OF LONG BEACH, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 For the reasons set forth in the Court’s partial grant and partial denial of 15 Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 16 41), the Court’s grant of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss certain causes of action in 17 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 53), and in the separate Order on 18 Summary Judgment entered this day, it is: 19 ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Leah Kando shall take nothing on 20 her claims against Defendants City of Long Beach, Lindsey Taylor-Law, Alfredo 21 Magana, Nadia Klute, Michael Ogden, and Jesus Valdez. Plaintiff’s claims are 22 DISMISSED with prejudice. 23 This is a Final Judgment. 24 25 26 27 Dated: October 1, 2021 _______________________________________ STANLEY BLUMENFELD, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.