Lavco Solutions, Inc. v. Biztracker Systems of St. John, LLC et al, No. 2:2020cv03286 - Document 115 (C.D. Cal. 2022)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. 1. The Court DENIES Plaintiff Lavco Solutions, Inc.'s (Plaintiff) ex parte application to stay all proceedings. See generally Dkt. # 108 . 2. The Court GRANTS Defendant Biztracker Systems of St. Jo hn, LLC's (Defendant) motion for summary judgment on each of Plaintiff's claims. See generally Dkt. # 95 . 3. The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss its claims. See generally Dkt. # 107 . 4. The Court GRANTS the parties' stipulation to voluntarily dismiss Defendant's counterclaims without prejudice. See generally Dkt. # 112 . This order closes the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lom)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Lavco Solutions, Inc. v. Biztracker Systems of St. John, LLC et al Doc. 115 06/15/22 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 5 6 Lavco Solutions, Inc. 7 8 Case No. 2:20-cv-03286 PSG (PLAx) Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT 9 Biztracker Systems of St. John, LLC 10 and DOES 1 through 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 1. The Court DENIES Plaintiff Lavco Solutions, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) ex parte application to stay all proceedings. See generally Dkt. # 108. 2. The Court GRANTS Defendant Biztracker Systems of St. John, LLC’s 16 (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment on each of Plaintiff’s claims. See generally 17 Dkt. # 95. 18 19 20 21 3. The Court DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss its claims. See generally Dkt. # 107. 4. The Court GRANTS the parties’ stipulation to voluntarily dismiss Defendant’s counterclaims without prejudice. See generally Dkt. # 112. 22 This order closes the case. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 June 15, 2022 Dated :________________ ____________________________ ________________________ Honorable S. Gutierrez Honorable Philip S United States Chief District Judge 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
