Blair Hays v. J. Gastelo et al, No. 2:2020cv02764 - Document 57 (C.D. Cal. 2021)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 43 by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion to for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (es)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Blair Hays v. J. Gastelo et al Doc. 57 Case 2:20-cv-02764-AB-JEM Document 57 Filed 08/04/21 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:185 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 BLAIR HAYS, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. J. GASTELO, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 20-2764-AB (JEM) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the 18 records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 19 Judge. Plaintiff has filed various Objections, and Defendants have filed a response to 20 Plaintiff’s initial Objections. The Court has considered all of the parties’ filings and has 21 reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the findings and 22 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 23 24 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants’ Motion to for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. 25 26 27 DATED: August 4. 2021 ANDRÉ BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
