Nichia Corporation v. Feit Electric Company, Inc., No. 2:2020cv00359 - Document 761 (C.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H. Wu: After trial and based on the evidence presented therein, this matter was submitted to the jury on January 19, 2023, and the jury returned a verdict of no infringement by Feit Electric. (Dkt. 748). Accordingly, I T IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECLARED that: 1) Defendant Feit Electric does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,752,734; 2) Final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant Feit Electric Company, Inc. and against Plaintiff Nichia Corporation's claims of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,752,734; 3) Plaintiff Nichia shall take nothing by way of its complaint in this action; and, 4) Defendant Feit Electric is entitled to an award of costs, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Local Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)

Download PDF
Nichia Corporation v. Feit Electric Company, Inc. Doc. 761 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 NICHIA CORPORATION, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 vs. CASE NO. CV 20-359-GW-Ex Honorable George H. Wu FINAL JUDGMENT FEIT ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TRADLING Y OCCA C ARLSON & R AUTH LAWYERS NEWPORT BEACH 20748761 v4 Dockets.Justia.com 1 After trial and based on the evidence presented therein, this matter was 2 submitted to the jury on January 19, 2023, and the jury returned a verdict of no 3 infringement by 4 ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECLARED that: Feit Electric. (Dkt. 748). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 5 1) Defendant Feit Electric does not infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,752,734; 6 2) Final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant Feit 7 Electric Company, Inc. and against Plaintiff Nichia Corporation’s claims 8 of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,752,734; 9 3) Plaintiff Nichia shall take nothing by way of its complaint in this action; 10 11 and, 4) Defendant Feit Electric is entitled to an award of costs, pursuant to the 12 13 procedures set forth in Local Rule 54. SO ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2023. 14 15 16 By: _________________________ The Honorable George H. Wu United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TRADLING Y OCCA C ARLSON & R AUTH -1[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT LAWYERS NEWPORT BEACH 20748761 v4 20-CV-00359

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.