Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan et al v. City of Los Angeles et al, No. 2:2019cv09302 - Document 122 (C.D. Cal. 2021)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Mark C. Scarsi: By reason of the special verdict, prior dismissals by Plaintiffs, and the Courts ruling on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, and MARIANA MANUKYAN recover nothing by reason of each and all of their claims as set forth in the First Amended Complaint against CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE, OFFICER ROMERO GONZALEZ, OFFICE R MARIO MENESES, SERGEANT FRED CUETO, OFFICER RODRIGO SORIA, OFFICER AIRAM POTTER, OFFICER BRITTANY OKE, OFFICER JEFF ROOD, OFFICER DANIEL MARTINEZ, OFFICER DANIEL GAYTON, and OFFICER EDUARDO PICHE. Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants. Defendants may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. The Court will address any arguments both Parties raise concerning Defendants' ability to recover costs upon the filing of a Motion to Retax Costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
Hasmik Jasmine Chinaryan et al v. City of Los Angeles et al Doc. 122 1 2 3 4 JS-6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, a Minor; MARIANA MANUKYAN, Case No. 2:19-cv-09302-MCS-E FINAL JUDGMENT 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE; OFFICER ROMERO GONZALEZ; OFFICER MARIO MENESES; SERGEANT FRED CUETO; OFFICER RODRIGO SORIA; OFFICER AIRAM POTTER; OFFICER BRITTANY OKE; OFFICER JEFF ROOD; OFFICER DANIEL MARTINEZ; OFFICER DANIEL GAYTON; OFFICER EDUARDO PICHE; and, DOES 8-10, inclusive, 26 Defendants. 27 28 /// 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 Pursuant to Rules 54 and 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and by 2 reason of the Court’s orders in this action and the jury’s special verdict, IT IS HEREBY 3 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 4 By reason of the special verdict, prior dismissals by Plaintiffs, and the Court’s 5 ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs HASMIK JASMINE 6 CHINARYAN, individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for NEC, and MARIANA 7 MANUKYAN recover nothing by reason of each and all of their claims as set forth in 8 the First Amended Complaint against CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES 9 POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE MICHEL MOORE, OFFICER 10 ROMERO GONZALEZ, OFFICER MARIO MENESES, SERGEANT FRED 11 CUETO, OFFICER RODRIGO SORIA, OFFICER AIRAM POTTER, OFFICER 12 BRITTANY OKE, OFFICER JEFF ROOD, OFFICER DANIEL MARTINEZ, 13 OFFICER DANIEL GAYTON, and OFFICER EDUARDO PICHE. Judgment is 14 entered in favor of all Defendants. 15 Defendants may file an Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs. C.D. Cal. L.R. 54- 16 2. The Court will address any arguments both Parties raise concerning Defendants’ 17 ability to recover costs upon the filing of a Motion to Retax Costs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 54(d)(1). 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 Dated: October 12, 2021 MARK C. SCARSI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.