Relevant Group, LLC et al v. Nourmand et al, No. 2:2019cv05019 - Document 167 (C.D. Cal. 2022)

Court Description: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 121 AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 123 124 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. The Court: (1) DENIES Sunset Landmark� 39;s Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 124 ); (2) DENIES N&A's Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 123 ); and (3) GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Relevant's Motion for Summary Judgment, (ECF No. 121 ). Summary judgment as to N&A's Eighteenth and Twentieth Affirmative Defenses is granted in Relevant's favor to the extent those Defenses are based on the express release language in the settlement agreements. Relevant's Motion is otherwise denied. (lom)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.