United States of America v. Jason Newling, No. 2:2019cv02262 - Document 9 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST JASON NEWLING filed by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: The court has jurisdiction over Jason Newling and over the subject matter of the proposed action pur suant to 28 U.S.C. 1340 and 1345. This Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction is the final judgment in this matter. Pursuant to the Stipulation, Newling has waived any and all right to appeal from this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (iv)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Jason Newling 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Doc. 9 NICOLA T. HANNA NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney JS-6 Chief, Tax Division JEREMY L. BURKHARDT (CA SBN 321744) Assistant United States Attorney Federal Building, Suite 7211 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-5810 Facsimile: (213) 894-0115 E-mail: Jeremy.Burkhardt@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WESTERN DIVISION 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 JASON NEWLING, 17 Case No.: 2:19-cv-02262 MWF FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST JASON NEWLING Defendant. 18 19 Pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Permanent Injunction Against Jason 20 Newling, filed concurrently herewith (the “Stipulation”): 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 22 23 24 1. The court has jurisdiction over Jason Newling (“Newling”) and over the subject matter of the proposed action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1345. 2. Newling admits the allegations of the complaint and has voluntarily consented to 25 the entry of a Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction against him, agrees it is 26 appropriate, and agrees to be bound by its terms. 27 28 3. Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402 and 7407, Newling, individually, or acting through or by any other name or entity, representatives, agents, employees, or attorneys, and 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 anyone in active participation with him who receives actual notice of this Final Judgment 2 of Permanent Injunction, is permanently enjoined, directly or indirectly, from: a. Aiding or assisting in the filing or preparation of federal or state tax returns 3 for anyone other than himself or his legal spouse or domestic partner; 4 b. Representing any person other than himself or his legal spouse or domestic 5 partner before the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authority; and 6 c. Owning, operating, or working for any company that provides services 7 8 relating to the filing, preparation, or payment of federal or state tax returns 9 and/or taxes. 4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter and Newling for the purpose of 10 11 enforcing this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. 5. The United States shall be entitled to conduct discovery to monitor Newling’s 12 13 compliance with the terms of this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. 6. This Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction is the final judgment in this matter. 14 15 Pursuant to the Stipulation, Newling has waived any and all right to appeal from this 16 Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. 17 7. Newling has consented to the entry of this Final Judgment of Permanent 18 Injunction without any further notice, and has agreed to be bound by its terms. 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 2 1 8. Newling may be subject to civil and criminal sanctions for contempt of court, 2 including imprisonment, if he violates this Final Judgment of Permanent Injunction. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: March 29, 2019 7 8 MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD United States District Judge 9 10 Presented By: 11 12 13 14 /s/ Jeremy L. Burkhardt JEREMY L. BURKHARDT Assistant United States Attorney 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.