Stephen H. Bafford et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al, No. 2:2018cv10219 - Document 73 (C.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Accordingly, the Court hereby enters Judgment in favor of Defendants and dismisses all of Plaintiffs claims with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall Close the Case. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Stephen H. Bafford et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al Doc. 73 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESTERN DIVISION 11 STEPHEN H. BAFFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, 12 13 vs. 14 15 NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) Case No. 2:18-cv-10219-ODW (Ex) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17 18 On January 7, 2020, the Court filed an Order Granting Defendants’ Motion 19 to Dismiss, dismissing Plaintiffs’ state-law claims with prejudice and granting 20 Plaintiffs leave to amend their remaining claims. (Order, ECF No. 68.) On January 21 22, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Intent Not to File Amended Complaint. (ECF 22 No. 69.) Accordingly, the Court hereby enters Judgment in favor of Defendants 23 and dismisses all of Plaintiffs’ claims with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall 24 Close the Case. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 3, 2020 ____________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II United States District Judge 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
