Mark Werthmann v. M. Murphy, No. 2:2018cv09078 - Document 25 (C.D. Cal. 2019)
Court Description: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS ORDERED that (1) The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 22 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; (2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 15 is DENIED; and (3) Defendant is ORDERED to file an Answer within 14 days of the issuance of this Order. (csi)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Mark Werthmann v. M. Murphy Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK WERTHMAN, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 Case No. 2:18-cv-09078-JAK (MAA) DOCTOR M. MURPHY, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. 16 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint (ECF No. 19 3), Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15), Plaintiff’s Opposition (ECF No. 20 18), Defendant’s Reply (ECF No. 19), the other records on file herein, and the 21 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 22). The 22 time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court 23 concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. 24 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: 25 1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is 26 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 27 28 2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; /// Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3. Defendant is ORDERED to file an Answer within fourteen (14) days of the issuance of this Order. 3 4 5 6 DATED: October 31, 2019 JOHN A. KRONSTADT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
