Brian J. Mahoney v. Nancy A. Berryhill, No. 2:2018cv05955 - Document 24 (C.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, Related to: Memorandum Opinion and Order 23 . IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brian J. Mahoney v. Nancy A. Berryhill Doc. 24 JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN J . M.1, an Individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 Case No.: 2:18-0 5955 ADS J UDGMENT OF DISMISSAL ANDREW M. SAUL2 , Com m issioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff’s nam e has been partially redacted in com pliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recom m endation of the Com m ittee on Court Adm inistration and Case Managem ent of the J udicial Conference of the United States. 2 On J une 17, 20 19, Saul becam e the Com m issioner of Social Security. Thus, he is autom atically substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). -1Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 In accordance with the Mem orandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 23, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJ UDGED that the decision of the Com m issioner of Social Security is affirm ed, and this action is dism issed with prejudice. 5 6 DATE: March 18, 20 20 7 8 / s/ Autum n D. Spaeth THE HONORABLE AUTUMN D. SPAETH United States Magistrate J udge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
