Linda Shahbazian et al v. Fast Auto Loans, Inc. et al, No. 2:2018cv03076 - Document 51 (C.D. Cal. 2019)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: On November 8, 2019, the Court granted final approval of the parties class action settlement and awarded Plaintiffs attorneys fees, costs, and service awards 48 . Final judgment is therefore ordered on the terms set forth in the Order Granting Final Approval To Class Action Settlement, dated November 8, 2019. Specifically, Plaintiffs and Participating Class Members will take that which is stated in the Class Action Settlement Agreement; and all claims in the Second Amended Complaint are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice as to Defendant. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
Linda Shahbazian et al v. Fast Auto Loans, Inc. et al 1 Doc. 51 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 CASE NO. 2:18-cv-03076-ODW(KS) LINDA SHAHBAZIAN and EDWIN MENDOZA, individuals, on Assigned to: Hon. Otis D. Wright II behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs, 18 vs. 19 FAST AUTO LOANS, INC., a California Corporation; and Does 1 through 50, Inclusive, 20 21 22 FINAL JUDGMENT Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2:18-CV-03076 JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 On November 8, 2019, the Court granted final approval of the parties’ 2 class action settlement and awarded Plaintiff’s attorney’s fees, costs, and service 3 awards. (Dkt. No. 48.) Final judgment is therefore ordered on the terms set forth in 4 the Order Granting Final Approval To Class Action Settlement, dated November 8, 5 2019. Specifically, Plaintiffs and Participating Class Members will take that 6 which is stated in the Class Action Settlement Agreement; and all claims in the 7 Second Amended Complaint are dismissed in their entirety with prejudice as to 8 Defendant. 9 Without affecting the finality of the Judgment, the Court will have 10 continuing jurisdiction over the Action and the Settlement solely for purposes of (i) 11 enforcing the Settlement Agreement, including resolution of any dispute concerning 12 any provision of the Agreement, (ii) addressing settlement administration matters, 13 and (iii) addressing such post-Judgment matters as may be appropriate under court 14 rules or applicable law. 15 The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 12/11/19_____________ 19 HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1CASE NO. 2:18-CV-03076 JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.