Broidy Capital Management, LLC et al v. State of Qatar et al, No. 2:2018cv02421 - Document 227 (C.D. Cal. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John F. Walter. Final Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Qatar, the Stonington Defendants and the GRA Defendants on Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing thereby. Judgment as to the Stonington Defendants and the GRA Defendants is without leave to amend and without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (iv)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Broidy Capital Management, LLC et al v. State of Qatar et al Doc. 227 1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WESTERN DIVISION 10 11 12 BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC and ELLIOTT BROIDY, 2:18-CV-02421-JFW-(Ex) Plaintiffs, [Assigned to Hon. John F. Walter] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Civil Case No.: v. ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT STATE OF QATAR, STONINGTON STRATEGIES LLC, NICOLAS D. MUZIN, GLOBAL RISK ADVISORS LLC, KEVIN CHALKER, DAVID MARK POWELL, MOHAMMED BIN HAMAD BIN KHALIFA AL THANI, AHMED AL-RUMAIHI, and DOES 1-10, Amended Complaint Filed: March 26, 2018 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 On August 8, 2018, the Court issued an order granting a Motion to Dismiss 2 brought by Defendant State of Qatar pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(2) on the 3 basis that Qatar is immune from suit under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, and 4 thereby dismissed Qatar from this action without leave to amend. Dkt. 198. 5 On August 16, 2018, the Court issued an order granting a Motion to Dismiss 6 brought by Defendants Stonington Strategies and Nicolas D. Muzin (collectively, the 7 “Stonington Defendants”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, and thereby dismissed the 8 Stonington Defendants from this action without leave to amend. Dkt. 209. Because the 9 Court lacked jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims against the Stonington Defendants, the 10 dismissal is properly considered as a dismissal without prejudice. 11 On August 22, 2018, the Court issued an order granting a Motion to Dismiss 12 brought by Defendants Global Risk Advisors and Kevin Chalker (collectively, the “GRA 13 Defendants”) for lack of personal jurisdiction, and thereby dismissed the GRA 14 Defendants from this action without leave to amend. Dkt. 212. Because the Court 15 lacked jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ claims against the GRA Defendants, the dismissal is 16 properly considered as a dismissal without prejudice. 17 On September 20, 2018, the Court issued a minute order, Dkt. 219, that provided: 18 … In light of Plaintiffs apparent willingness to dismiss the Unserved 19 Defendants, Plaintiffs shall file the dismissals on or before September 24, 20 2018. After the dismissals are filed, Lead Counsel are ordered to meet and 21 confer and prepare a joint proposed Judgment. The parties shall lodge a 22 joint proposed Judgment with the Court on or before September 26, 2018. 23 In the unlikely event that counsel are unable to agree upon a joint proposed 24 Judgment, the parties shall each submit separate versions of a proposed 25 Judgment, along with a declaration outlining their objections to the opposing 26 party's version, no later than September 26, 2018. All issues regarding the 27 28 1 ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT 1 Designations made pursuant to the Protective Order shall be submitted to 2 Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. 3 Pursuant to that order, on September 24, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Voluntary 4 Dismissal, voluntarily dismissing the remaining defendants in this action: David Mark 5 Powell, Mohammed Bin Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani, and Ahmed Al- 6 Rumaihi(collectively, the “Unserved Defendants”). Dkt. 223. The Plaintiffs’ dismissal 7 of the Unserved Defendants was made without prejudice. 8 Accordingly, as all defendants have been dismissed from this action, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 10 1. Final Judgment is entered in favor of the State of Qatar, the Stonington 11 Defendants and the GRA Defendants on Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, and 12 Plaintiffs shall take nothing thereby. 13 14 2. Judgment as to the Stonington Defendants and the GRA Defendants is without leave to amend and without prejudice. 15 3. Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is dismissed, as to all causes of action. 16 4. All issues regarding the Designations made pursuant to the Protective Order 17 18 shall be submitted to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. 5. This order constitutes a final, appealable judgment. 19 20 DATED: September 27, 2018 ____________________ The Honorable John F. Walter United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER OF FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
